allballs

Lists: pgsql-docs
From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: allballs
Date: 2005-01-24 19:28:48
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A75D9@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs

I have to ask this...why is 'allballs' accepted as a literal for time?
I checked the dictionary and wikipedia and couldn't find a reason why.

Merlin


From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: allballs
Date: 2005-01-24 20:06:45
Message-ID: 20050124200645.GA6126@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:28:48PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> I have to ask this...why is 'allballs' accepted as a literal for time?

"Allballs" is slang for "all zeros" because zeros look like balls.
You hear it sometimes in environments that use a 24-hour clock
(communications, military, etc.). Here's an example:

http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf2-3.html

I don't know that "allballs" is specified in any standard, so I
suspect that somebody who used the term added it to PostgreSQL
(or whatever it was called at the time) for convenience.

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: allballs
Date: 2005-01-24 20:18:56
Message-ID: 24526.1106597936@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> "Allballs" is slang for "all zeros" because zeros look like balls.
> You hear it sometimes in environments that use a 24-hour clock
> (communications, military, etc.). Here's an example:

> http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf2-3.html

> I don't know that "allballs" is specified in any standard, so I
> suspect that somebody who used the term added it to PostgreSQL
> (or whatever it was called at the time) for convenience.

I'm sure it isn't in any SQL standard ;-). Tom Lockhart is doubtless
responsible for it being in our code; I suppose he put it in because it
is in reasonably common use at JPL.

regards, tom lane


From: elein(at)varlena(dot)com (elein)
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: allballs
Date: 2005-01-24 21:08:54
Message-ID: 20050124210853.GD15269@varlena.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:18:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> > "Allballs" is slang for "all zeros" because zeros look like balls.
> > You hear it sometimes in environments that use a 24-hour clock
> > (communications, military, etc.). Here's an example:
>
> > http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf2-3.html
>
> > I don't know that "allballs" is specified in any standard, so I
> > suspect that somebody who used the term added it to PostgreSQL
> > (or whatever it was called at the time) for convenience.
>
> I'm sure it isn't in any SQL standard ;-). Tom Lockhart is doubtless
> responsible for it being in our code; I suppose he put it in because it
> is in reasonably common use at JPL.
>
> regards, tom lane

Actually I think all of the weird psuedonyms for 000000 were in
postgres very early on. I remember seeing them in illustra
and we branched postgres in 1992. So I blame funky grad students.

--elein